AlameedEnglish: September 2017

Saturday, September 30, 2017

Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques

07 Phrases for responding to RUDE people

Friday, September 29, 2017

Stative Verbs, Action Verbs, and Verbs that can be both

4 BIGGEST tips on Present Perfect Continuous

Friday, September 22, 2017

Can you learn a language just by listening?

Is it possible for you to learn a language just by listening?

after a while you do kind of understand what people are talking about, so you can often guess from the situation. But You are not able to put a sentence together, and join in the conversation. Because although you kind of understand what people are saying, you just haven't developed the skill of moving your tongue and saying the words of the other language.

So I would say taking that approach is a very, very frustrating, and slow, and ineffective way to learn any language. And that's based from my personal experience.

Sunday, September 17, 2017

12 Intonation

Friday, September 15, 2017

100 English Homophones with American Accent

Listening Practice - What is she saying? (43)

American English Reduction Exercises.

Reduction in Presidential Speeches

9 English Contractions You Should Never Use and Why!

9 English Contractions You Should Never Use and Why

An English contraction occurs when two words combine to make one word—words like “don’t,” “I’ll,” and “let’s.” Contractions are nothing new. In fact, they have been commonly used since 7^th century Old English when writers still wrote using the runic alphabet.

Contractions represent a more efficient way to write and to speak. They allow us to convey our thoughts in fewer words. This is helpful considering we live in an era of text messages and 140-character Twitter updates. And, in days long past, before printing presses, English contractions saved writers the pain of writing out every single letter of every single word (Those quill pens must have been a real pain in the hand!).

While editing ESL papers at Kibin, I have found that many ESL writers are uncomfortable with the concept of English contractions. These writers misuse them, use them too liberally, or avoid them altogether.

In this post, I want to focus on the misuse of contractions. I’m going to teach you the fundamentals of English contractions, discuss which English contractions you should never use and why, and give you a heads-up on some of the more common informal contractions (But, don’t use them in your next English assignment…or else!).

The Important Apostrophe

First, let’s talk about how exactly you can create a single word out of two words. It involves using an apostrophe. An apostrophe is the punctuation mark found at the top of a letter.

This little punctuation mark has a big job to do when it comes to English contractions. It stands in for the letter or letters you omit.

For example, the contracted form of “do not” becomes “don’t.” As you can see, the apostrophe stands in for the “o” in “not.”

Similarly, the contracted form of “he will” becomes “he’ll.” In this contraction, the apostrophe stands in for the “wi” in “will.”

And “they would” becomes “they’d.” The apostrophe does the big job of standing in for “woul” in this contraction.

Warning! You Can’t Contract Just Any Word

Now that you know how to use the apostrophe to create English contractions, don’t get too carried away. You can’t just go in and contract any two words in the English language. The words you can contract are pretty much set in stone (and I’ll be going deeper into that in a future post).

Wouldn’t it be fun if you could, though? I might write something like, “Y’can’t just go’n an’contract jus’any’f t’words i’the Eng’language.” But, I won’t, because then I would sound drunk, which I’m not.

While most writers don’t try to contract every single word in the English language, I often see some commonly misused English contractions. With that in mind, here are three English contractions that you should never use:

Amn’t

A lot of ESL writers make the mistake of thinking that since you can contract “is not” and “are not” into “isn’t” and “aren’t,” you should similarly be able to contract “am not” into “amn’t.”

The truth is, there is no contraction for “am not,” and “amn’t” is not a recognized word…anymore.

Yes, I said “anymore” because apparently “amn’t” and its cousin “an’t” were commonly used in the English language sometime in the 1600s. And, surprisingly, “amn’t” is still used in Ireland and Scotland (no wonder those dialects are so difficult to understand for those accustomed to U.S. English).

Today, in U.S. English, you can still find some communities that use a distant cousin of “am’t.” That word is “ain’t.”

And, even though Christina Aguilera uses “ain’t” (incorrectly, I might add) in her lyrics, “ain’t” is considered highly informal and should not be used in most writing. Check out this great article for more information on “amn’t,” “an’t,” and “ain’t.”

Willn’t or Win’t

As tempting as it may be to use the apostrophe rule to contract “will not” into “willn’t” or even “win’t,” you shouldn’t.

The contraction of “will not” is a weird exception to the apostrophe rule, as it becomes “won’t.”

So, why is it an exception to the rule? The answer to this riddle comes from Old English habits. The word “will” has gone through quite the language evolution, including many spelling changes, one of which was “woll.” A sensible contraction of “woll” could indeed be “won’t.”

In addition, “willn’t” was an accepted form of this contraction for some time—even into the late 1800s. But, because the point of contractions is brevity, the ultimate favorite, which is still commonly used today, became “won’t.”

Read this post for more information about why “will not” is contracted as “won’t.”

I’s

You can contract “she has” and “she is” to make “she’s,” and you can contract “he has” and “he is” to make “he’s,” as well as “I am” to make “I’m,” and “I have” to make “I’ve.”

But, “I’s” is not a word.

I’m not sure why people use “I’s,” but I suspect it has something to do with misinterpreting the following two rules.

First of all, you can’t contract “I is” because “I is” has improper subject-verb agreement. “I” does not go with “is.” It’s just not right. The correct agreement is “I am,” so the correct contraction is “I’m.”

Second, and I think this is the more common problem, “I was” cannot be contracted into “I’s.” In English, you can’t contract verbs in simple past tense.

That being said, there are certain U.S. dialects where speakers use it as an informal contraction. “I’s gonna do it!” is an informal English contraction of the phrase “I was going to do it.”

Aside from these three contraction no-nos, there are some that are technically legal, but that you shouldn’t use anyway.

Watch Out for Contractions that Native English Speakers Don’t Commonly Use!

These six contractions are grammatically legal, but they are not commonly used in either speaking or writing.

Where’d (where had)
Why’d (why had)
When’d (when had)
Why’d (why would)
What’d (what would)
When’d (when would)

These six contractions are uncommon for a simple reason. U.S. English speakers prefer using them to express questions with the past tense form of “did,” like this:

Where’d (where did)
Why’d (why did)
When’d (when did)
Why’d (why did)
What’d (what did)
When’d (when did)

So, when you ask, “Where’d you go?” native English speakers will think you are asking, “Where did you go?” and not “Where would you go?” The answer to these two questions would be very, very different (“I went to school in Missouri, but I would prefer to go to Hawaii”).

By playing favorites, English speakers avoid a lot of confusion in communication. However, please note that these contractions with “did” are highly informal and should only be used in speaking and informal writing.

You may have noticed that native English speakers like to mush a lot of their words together in informal speaking and writing.